Strategy / Opinions

Jun13

Are hoaxes good marketing?

Seth Godin wrote a post the other day that said hoaxes are uneth­i­cal mar­ket­ing.  I’m not sure I totally agree.  His post cen­tered around this pop­corn cell phone video that’s really amaz­ing to see.

YouTube Preview Image

Now this mes­sage isn’t rel­e­vant to a cell phone brand (omg that’s going into my brain?) nor does it say much for the pop corn (so con­vien­ant you can pop it with your phone?) but it does gen­er­ate that “NO WAY” moment and you imme­di­ately start­ing think­ing on whether it could be true.  Whether it is or isn’t, you’re still trying to figure it out.

Here’s an exam­ple that’s closer to brand relevancy:

YouTube Preview Image

Did he really make the jump?  Do Nike shoes help you do super­hu­man things?  Is Kobe super­hu­man?  Regardless of whether it’s a hoax or not, people are buzzing over Kobe.

I think Pow­er­ade did the best job with this type of mar­ket­ing.  Anyone remem­ber the Michael Vick com­mer­i­cal?  (Too bad he didn’t stick to football).

YouTube Preview Image

What do you think?  Is hoax mar­ket­ing unethical?

7 Comments / Follow this Post

  1. Fri, June 13 2008

    Hey,
    Hoaxes can be good viral mar­ket­ing if done prop­erly. If you click the url I copied, it is another hoax for a movie. I think the target audi­ence needs to be kept in mind always. Some people think this type of mar­ket­ing is boring and some people will think it is awe­some. From an eth­i­cal per­spec­tive, I think that most people have a b.s. filter in their brain for most adver­tis­ing.

  2. Fri, June 13 2008

    So I totally believe Michael Vik can throw a ball 300 yards, but an explod­ing Pow­er­ade bottle? What a bunch of crap.

  3. Fri, June 13 2008

    @brand­bull­dawg Yeah, the office freak out clip made its way around the office ear­lier this week. While it’s well known now it’s a hoax, what a great way to build excite­ment for the movie. Blair Witch did some­thing sim­i­lar, remem­ber?

  4. Thu, June 19 2008

    I think it is impor­tant to dif­fer­en­ti­ate a hoax from bla­tant false adver­tis­ing. Beauty and weight lose prod­ucts that use pho­to­shopped pic­tures in their ads are prob­a­bly more uneth­i­cal that some fun videos.

  5. Fri, June 20 2008

    @Medi­aMis­fit I think level of absur­dity helps as well. If Pow­er­ade claimed you could throw the foot­ball 10 yards far­ther, then it would be mis­lead­ing instead of a funny way of saying it “propels” you. Great point!

  6. Thu, June 26 2008

    Com­mer­cials are meant to grab our atten­tion and create some buzz about the brand or indus­try rep­re­sented.

    I would ven­ture to say that a hoax is uneth­i­cal for prod­uct pro­mo­tion when its real world appli­ca­tion can result in seri­ous injury or death or per­sonal ruin. For exam­ple when Volvo rein­forced their car in the com­mer­cial with steel beams to keep it from being crushed. They had to fork over alot of $$ to avoid a deceptive- adver­tis­ing law­suit.

    How­ever com­mer­cials like Tiger Woods jug­gling the golf ball using only his club. Was it a hoax? Yep, but it was great to see and it’s not far from tricks he per­forms when on tour.
    Just like Vick. The dude throws hard! HArd enough to knock a man off his feet? eh.. still fun to watch though.

    Not every com­mer­cial is “true”. Most are very boring. But in this Viral day and age, com­mer­cials need to step out and enter­tain the viewer just like the any­thing else on TV.

  7. Thu, June 26 2008

    @xir­cle­box I would agree that if a com­mer­cial made claims that could get people hurt, it would fall into “unethical”. Good point.

    And Tiger Woods drib­bling the golf ball is NOT a hoax. He used to prac­tice while wait­ing at junior tour­na­ments as a kid. It’s been repli­cated a couple of times on YouTube:
    http://​youtube.​com/​w​a​t​c​h​?​v​=​P​2​y​g​j​A​HElVw

    Thanks for your com­ment!

Leave a Comment /

Cancel Reply

* Required fields

Marblehead created this blog to show off our work, share our opinions, and pass on industry news.